A mate told me that in SC they allocate 3300 points to a game, and they are all used in the game. Sometimes at the end of a game players are given extra points for kicks, or the might get point for a clanger, just to use all the points. We did not believe it. How could our beloved SC have the dodgiest scoring system ever?? So we went onto the heraldsun website to add up the points from a game and we chose the Sydney v Hawks game and it added up to 3300!!! I was shocked. KB i was wondering if u could confirm why such a terrible system is used, and why it is capped at 3300. Why dont u just get point as they are allocated, and not worry about the total??? Does afl.com's Dream Team use the same system? If this is true then SC is a joke, unless there is a good reason.

if thats true........ i no longer (not that i ever) believe in god

I think your a bit loopy mate.

Add up another game...

ok

That's OK. Thanks to you God no longer believes in Himself.

Sorry about my loopy comment but I see you're right now. But it's always 3,299 or 3,300 or 3,301?

Coincidence???

Cats v Tigers: 3299
Saints v Crows: 3301
Pies v Dees: 3299
Lions v Blues: 3296
Hawks v Swans: 3301
Bombers V Freo: 3301
Dogs v Roos: 3300
Eagles v Port: 3300

Ash, you're slow. We were talking about this the other day, there was a link to a thread on BF in one of our threads.

Pretty sure it's true, they worked out a few games on BF and the total points were always very close to 3300, plus KB is always very shifty when you ask him about the scores. Even back when I was a mod, I suggested we do a thread explaining the scoring and pricing system to everyone, but was shut down.

I was very surprised because it would have ment we talked about SC alot more and that seems to be what KB is after.

You'd think they would be open and honest about the scoring, unless they had something to hide.



There you go, that pretty much proves it.

I wonder if we'll get an explaination.

It was nice knowing you Ash but I'm afraid KB will have to "disappear" you now.

Sh!ttest poll ever.

Should include a third option:

"How the FRUIT would I know?"

Seriously, how the hell would anyone on here know if it is accurate or not?

Dave,

Sorry didnt see that previous post. I think it is a bloody joke if u know the scores of the game, before it even starts. It means in a game where a team kicks 20 goals and has 400 touches, but get beaten by a team who kicks 25 goals with 450 touches, the SC score will be the same as a game where only 12 goals are kicked with say 600 touches. It sucks big time, and i am not happy about it. Why would it be this way??? Wonder if we will get an explanation this time then?

Happy now??????

as a pig in schit!!

thanks ash!

It's always rather sad seeing the young collide with the sad realities of life....

Basically, if there's a possibility of something being scammed-up, it will be!

anytime sly!!!

so your saying i'm goD? i'm not even that Bazza-Pro

(Insert Eljay remark here CP)

This might be done to even out the .................................WTF
Why would I even try to reason out an unfair scoring card.

It's akin to cheating IMO

Keelobyte please explain or at least tell us the numbers above are a complete coincidence and we will check them weekly to find out.

Do you think it might just be a case of 3300 being an easy number to work with when pricing players or something? Buggered if I know.

It proves once and for all that SC scores are not a fair way to rate players though. It seems like some guys are getting more points for kicks than others depending on how crap a game it is. The scores/prices are pretty much meaningless away from the SuperCoach game.

This is obviously why Champion Data are not releasing live supercoach scores